Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-05-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-05-09 House Journal Page 1804 SB 51 The following which was held in second reading for today's calendar (page 1709) with pending Amendment No. 1, was again before the House: SENATE BILL NO. 51 "An Act providing for establishment of work camps for juveniles adjudicated delinquent, and extending to all cities and to nonprofit corporations authority to maintain facilities for juveniles." with the: Journal Page FIN RPT 5DP 6NR 1661 -SENATE FN (DHSS) 3/8/93 1662 Amendment No. 1 by Representative Ulmer (page 1708) was again before the House. Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be withdrawn. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Ulmer: Page 5, line 24, before "committed": Insert "16 years of age or older and," 1993-05-09 House Journal Page 1805 SB 51 Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Porter objected. The Speaker placed a call of the House. The call was satisfied. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 51 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 25 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Moses, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Parnell, Phillips, Sitton, Ulmer, Williams, Willis Nays: Barnes, Bunde, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Kott, Larson, Martin, Mulder, Olberg, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 2 was adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Ulmer: Page 5, line 26, after "with": Insert "(A) laws applicable to the employment of children; and (B)" Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Hanley objected. 1993-05-09 House Journal Page 1806 SB 51 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 51 am H Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, James, Menard, Nicholia, Nordlund, Ulmer Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams, Willis And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representative Ulmer: Page 5, line 2, after "(a)" through line 6: Delete all material. Insert "A city [HAVING A POPULATION OF 1700 OR MORE, ACCORDING TO THE LATEST DECENNIAL CENSUS, OR FOUND BY THE DEPARTMENT TO HAVE A PRESENT POPULATION OF 1700 OR MORE] may maintain and operate a juvenile detention [HOME OR] facility, and a city or a nonprofit corporation may maintain and operate a juvenile detention home or a juvenile work camp." Representative Ulmer moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Objection was heard and withdrawn. There being no further objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative B.Davis: Page 5, lines 11 - 13: Delete all material and insert: "(a) The department shall adopt standards and regulations for the operation of 1993-05-09 House Journal Page 1807 SB 51 (1) juvenile detention homes and juvenile detention facilities in the state; and (2) juvenile work camps in the state; the regulations adopted under this paragraph must provide a means by which to ensure that a minor who is placed in a work camp (A) is in good physical and mental condition and able to perform the work and engage in the activities that may be required of the minor; (B) does not present a danger to the physical safety of other minors who are placed in the work camp." Representative B.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Kott objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 51 am H Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 23 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Grussendorf, Hoffman, James, Mackie, MacLean, Menard, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Phillips, Sanders, Sitton, Ulmer, Willis Nays: Bunde, G.Davis, Green, Hanley, Hudson, Kott, Larson, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Olberg, Parnell, Porter, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams And so, Amendment No. 5 was adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative B.Davis: 1993-05-09 House Journal Page 1808 SB 51 Page 5, line 24 after "facility": Delete "may" Insert "shall" Page 5, line 25 after "to": Delete "labor on the buildings and grounds or perform any other work or engage in any activities that do not" Insert "complete a treatment plan that includes behavioral, educational, psychological, family and community and work components, but may not be required to engage in any activities that" Representative B.Davis moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Kott objected. Representative Navarre rose to a point of order regarding speaking for a member of another body. The Speaker stated the point was well taken. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 51 am H Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, B.Davis, Finkelstein, Hoffman, James, Mackie, Menard, Nicholia, Sitton, Ulmer, Williams, Willis 1993-05-09 House Journal Page 1809 SB 51 Nays: Barnes, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hudson, Kott, Larson, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that SB 51 am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 51 am H was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SB 51 am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 51 am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 3 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Davies, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Menard, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Williams, Willis Nays: Carney, Davidson, Vezey Brice changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, SB 51 am H passed the House. Representative Vezey gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on SB 51 am H.